MadcapLaughs.Narod.Ru

 

 

 

SYD BARRETT, SILAS LANG & SUNSHINE

OR: THE PROS AND CONS OF NIT PICKING

 

By Jon Allan, Publisher of Late Night Magazine

 

The two Swan Lee/Silas Lang instrumentals and the short (1:24) instrumental often called Sunshine (its also been called, at various times Experiment, The Madcaps Embrace, Class Act & In The Beechwoods) are, hands down, the most confusing Syd Barrett tracks currently in circulation. Nobody knows exactly when they were recorded, or who, apart from Syd, plays on them. Everybody has their own theory, though, and many of them point the finger at... Pink Floyd!

 

But are these really leftovers from Piper or the final 67 sessions? And if not, what are they? Solo sessions, perhaps? In an effort to clear up some of these mysteries, Ive spent a great deal of time pouring over the dozens of books, articles, session notes and other related materials on Pink Floyd that Ive collected since the mid-80s, and come up with... Well, read on and see for yourself. It may get confusing (OK, it will get confusing) at times, but I think youll ultimately find it rewarding, too!

 

Id like to first start out by addressing two theories that just wont die: the Peter Jenner theory and the 1966 theory. Jenner first:

 

Peter Jenner, as most Floydfans know, was one of the bands two original co-managers (Andrew King was his partner, and together they formed the management portion of Blackhill Enterprises). Blackhill was a six way partnership between Pink Floyd, Andrew King and Jenner, which lasted roughly from late 1966 until early March 1968, at which point Syd left the band under circumstances that even today are unclear. Jenner and King then chose to continue managing Syd (Jenner became his first producer), while Floyd signed with the Bryan Morrison Agency.

 

The Jenner Theory advanced by Sydfan Chris Mawson in the late 1980s, goes like this: Sometime before Syds first solo session in May of 1968, either he or Peter Jenner began reviewing old, unused Pink Floyd tapes that they had in their possession, with the idea of crafting them into new Barrett material. For evidence he cites the fact that three Floyd tapes containing Barrett-era material were logged with EMI on May 5th (Tape 68409-4T In The Beechwoods, No Title; Tape 68410-4T Vegetable Man, Instrumental & a second take of Beechwoods); and May 6th (Tape 68411-4T Untitled) Syds first solo sessions took place at Abbey Road on May 6th (or 13th, sources differ), and Swan Lee (then known as Silas Lang) appears in the session notes as published in the Late Malcolm Jones booklet The Making Of The Madcap Laughs. So the closeness between the dates that Floyd logged Barrett-era tapes and Syd began working on his first album would stand to make Silas Lang a carry over (possibly No Title, Instrumental or Untitled) from the Floyd days, right?

 

Wrong. While its entirely possible that the instrumental piece which eventually became Swan Lee dates from his Floyd days, the recording(s) of it are solo tracks. Even if a Floyd version existed and Syd or Jenner had a copy of it, they would have been unable to continue working on it or release it to the public. Syd was no longer a member of Pink Floyd and Peter Jenner no longer managed them. This being the case, neither had any legal (vs. artistic) right to review, work on or release any material dating from tenure with the band. And I doubt that the Floyd camp and Bryan Morrison would have let him do so out of friendship, either, since one of the strongest points of their re-negotiated EMI contract relates to the bands sole ownership of all unreleased material recorded during their professional career. Even EMI couldnt release an outtake collection (or something a la Beatles Anthology) without the expressed permission of Pink Floyd, something which they aint givin!

 

To further illustrate my point, consider this: In January of 1969 the Beatles recorded nearly 30 hours of material for the project which eventually became Let It Be, an album which clocks in at just over thirty-four minutes. That leaves a lot of useable stuff in the can. Now what if, say Paul, had decided to dust some of those unreleased songs off and put them on one of his solo albums? He wouldnt have been able to - even the songs that hed written - because they are the property of The Beatles, a (business) entity of which he was only one-fourth. What he could (and like John and George, did) do would be to re-record the songs he wanted, in effect covering himself and bypassing any legal problems. If Swan Lee does indeed date from his Floyd days, this is almost certainly what Syd did. And just why, if he had no right to be working with them, would Peter Jenner have logged material with EMI as Pink Floyd, rather than Syd Barrett tapes? Im pretty sure the tapes were being reviewed and logged by the Floyd themselves while they were selecting material for A Saucerful Of Secrets.

 

The second theory relates to the three tracks in question coming from a 1966 Thompsons Private Recording Company session. I dont believe this to be true, and wont believe it until Floyd says it is or somebody shows me a vintage 1966 reel-to-reel tape and corresponding paperwork to prove it! For one thing, sound quality wise (all Thompsons had was a simple 2-track mono recording setup) and stylistically they sound nothing like the existing 1966 material that we do have... What I think has happened is tape traders began listing these tracks as being from 1966 because they could then trade them to other collectors who wrongly thought they were getting something that they didnt have. The more people who did this, or who got material without knowing what it really was and passed it around, the more legitimacy the 1966 date got. Eventually it ended up in at least one book and on several boot CDs, so therell always be some fans who believe it, but remember, caveat emptor: know what youre getting before you buy or trade!

 

OK, so what about Swan Lee/Silas Lang, anyway? If these two instrumentals arent Floyd tracks, just what are they? Well, heres what the published paperwork tells us:

 

Early in May of 1968 (the 6th or 13th) Syd and Peter Jenner entered Abbey Road Studios with the intention of recording songs for a solo album. This first session produced a version (or versions) of Silas Lang (as Swan Lee was alternately known) and a version of Late Night which appears to have been erased.

 

Work would continue on Silas at sessions held May 21st, 28th (this is the recording date listed for Take 5 in the Opel liner notes, and the first time the song appears as Swan Lee), June 8th and June 20th. These Jenner sessions were ultimately unable to produce close to an albums worth of material, and only one more (July 20th) was held before the project was abandoned. When work started up again in April 1969, Syd and new producer Malcolm Jones (who was also the head of Harvest Records at the time) were still interested in the song. It was worked on during the first Jones session (April 10th), and I believe its from this date that we get Jones spoken intro Silas Lang. This is RM1, from 4-Track; Take 1 found on the Flaming And Screaming LP. Take 1 in this case would refer to new overdubs, since its a stated copy from a 4-Track master.

 

It would appear that the song was completed (if indeed the version on Opel is how Syd intended it to be) at Barrett-produced sessions held on April 24th. Jones was too ill to attend, so Syd took this opportunity to transfer eight songs (No Good Trying, Terrapin, Opel, Clowns And Jugglers, Love You, Golden Hair, Late Night and Swan Lee) from 4 to 8-Track, for the purpose of further overdubbing. He also worked on Swan Lee and possibly Late Night (As a side note, its very interesting to see what songs Syd had intended to put on The Madcap Laughs). This would be the last time Swan Lee/Silas Lang appeared in Abbey Road paperwork until 1974. When it came time for Dave Gilmour and Roger Waters to mix and assemble Madcap, Swan Lee was not among the songs used. Later Dave said that they most likely thought that Opel was a working title of a song which Syd later re-recorded. This is probably what happened to Swan Lee as well.

 

Now before we move on, Ive got a little more to say about Swan Lee/Silas Lang. I believe that at least two (and possibly three) of the five takes known to have been done currently circulate. The best known, obviously, is the 3:09 vocal version (Take 5) found on Opel. The two bootleg instrumentals are 2:34 (Early Instrumental) and 2:36 (Banjo/Sax Instrumental) respectively, so its possible that one is simply an overdubbed version of the other, or even that all three versions utilize the same guitar track. Opel and Crazy Diamond co-compiler Phil Smee believes the Banjo and Saxophone part to be the result of copying the unmixed track onto a poorly wiped (erased) mastertape, but I disagree. Heres why: In 1973 Roger Waters told Zig Zag magazine that towards the end of his time with Pink Floyd, Syd had a great plan...to expand the group, get in two geezers, some two freaks that hed met someplace or other. One of them played banjo and the other played saxophone. We werent into that at all, and it was obvious that the crunch had finally come.

 

Now consider this: Abbey Road paperwork fails to record the several (to this day anonymous) musicians who are known to have played on some of Syds 1968 solo sessions. The backing track to Late Night almost certainly features outside musicians, and when Opel and Crazy Diamond co-compilers Phil Smee and Brian Hogg tracked down the original engineer of the Rhamadan sessions, he told them that some weird friends (of Syds) came along to the session. Now since work began on Swan Lee only a few months after the time when Syd is supposed to have wanted to add two banjo and saxophone playing freaks to Pink Floyds ranks, I think its very possible that he may have still been interested in working with those same two freaks once hed gone solo. Something to think about, at least.

 

Confused yet? No? Well get ready to be! Silas Lang shows up again not once but twice in 1974, as part of two very different projects. Since its still unclear which one came first, Ive chosen to cover them in the following order for claritys sake.

 

Towards the end of 1974 Peter Jenner again managed to get Syd into Abbey Road for the purpose of cutting a new album. By all accounts the sessions, which lasted for three or four days, were pretty dire. For one thing, Syd showed up with no material prepared and no strings on his guitar. He also was prone to wander away, not returning, and may even have bit an Abbey Road employee! The end result was three reels of mostly unfinished, untitled instrumentals, the most complete of which featured bass and drum overdubs done by Syd himself. When these tapes were reviewed during the making of the Crazy Diamond box set, they were found to contain no vocal tracks apart from the odd bit of studio chatter.

 

Whats interesting, though, is that the recording sheets for these reels (as reproduced in Chapter 24 magazine #4) contain the title Silas Lang! Its listed towards the end of the third and final reel, and runs from 20:48 to 23:30 (making it 2:42 long). Notes indicate that there was no bass on this track. Now heres what I think happened: as the already disastrous sessions wound to a close, Peter Jenner was probably getting increasingly desperate to get something useable down on tape. Remembering Silas from his 1968 sessions, and being aware that it didnt appear on Syds previous two solo albums, Jenner may have suggested that they try re-recording it. Since Syd didnt even bother to do any overdubs on this version, its safe to say that he wasnt terribly interested in it. I also strongly doubt that either one of the circulating instros date from 1974. Theyre much closer to finished tracks than the other 74 bits weve so far heard, and appeared on the collectors market almost 10 years before those bits did!

 

Now 1974 also saw a very mysterious stereo mixing session take place at Abbey Road. The songs mixed down were: Silas Lang, Scream Thy Last Scream, Vegetable Man, Milky Way, Wouldnt You Miss Me? (Dark Globe), Untitled (67), Opel, Birdy Hop and The Word Song. This information comes from Michael Wests article Two More Of A Kind, which appeared in issue 12 of the 1980s Sydzine Opel. Wests session information came from phone conversations he had with archivists at Abbey Road. Amazingly, this potentially explosive information remained largely buried for nearly 15 years!

 

It would seem that someone at EMI attempted to put together a pre-Opel rarities album way back in 74. If this was the case, the very fact that three Floyd-era songs were included probably insured that it never saw the light of day. However, by 1985 almost all, if not all of the above songs were circulating amongst collectors; could this mean that a copy of the tape found its way into someones hands? And more importantly, since Silas Lang was included on it, would that make Sunshine really Untitled (67)? I for one dont think so. But dont start e-mailing me yet! Weve still got a way to go...

 

By the early 1980s, demand for new Barrett product of any kind was high and getting higher all the time. True, previously unknown material was beginning to turn up on bootleg, but fans still hungered for an official outtakes album. Around this time, Sydfan Phil Smee began collecting tapes in the hopes of releasing a licensed multi-LP rarities set on his Bam Carouso label. Ultimately this proved to be impossible, but Smee continued to make a name for himself in the music industry with his anthology style collections for other 60s artists.

 

By 1987 EMI had finally decided that there was enough interest in Syd Barrett and his music to merit their releasing a rarities collection, and brought in Syds second producer, Malcolm Jones (himself a collector of unreleased Barrett material), to oversee the project. Ill health prevented him from doing more than spending a day compiling a tape of unmixed outtakes and trying out rough mixes of Swan Lee, Opel, and a few other songs. The whole thing was then turned over to Phil Smee and Brian Hogg, who compiled the Opel album from the best of Syds unissued material. In 1996 Smee gave an extensive interview in the pages of Chapter 24 magazine, and the following is drawn exclusively from it.

 

During the initial meeting with EMI, Smee and Hogg were played a tape of a 1967 Pink Floyd instrumental which was, they were told, an unfinished backing track cut at the bands first EMI session. Smee described it as being about four minutes (long) and sound(ing) a bit like the middle section of See Emily Play. It was part of a cassette which circulated within EMI containing unreleased Barrett and Pink Floyd material being considered for possible release. Early on the duo were even allowed to review Floyd tapes of Vegetable Man, but quickly found out that all Floyd-era material was out of bounds thanks to the bands contract.

 

Was the tape Smee and Hogg were played the same as the one compiled at the 1974 stereo mixing session? Probably. But it would also appear that there was at least one other tape of Barrett outtakes then in existence. Specifically the one containing rough mixes of solo material which Malcolm Jones put together in 1987. Phil Smee told Chapter 24s David Parker that this tape contained not only the two Swan Lee/Silas Lang instrumentals, but also the first version of the 1:24 Sunshine instrumental that hed heard. This is important...

 

Important because Jones knew from firsthand experience that Syds Floyd -or any other unreleased Floyd material- was off limits. He learned the hard way in 1970 when, as head of Harvest Records, he released the sampler album Picnic: A Breath Of Fresh Air. This 2 LP set not only contained Syds Terrapin, but also an unfinished demo of Floyds Embryo. The latter was included without the bands knowledge or consent, and consequently Picnic had to be withdrawn. Would Jones have added a Floyd-era track to a rough tape of potential Barrett releases knowing full well that the band would block it?

 

So what does that leave us with? Well, heres what I think is the most likely scenario: by 1974 EMI had decided that a third Barrett album stood a good chance of being successful and had someone compile a stereo tape of nine songs from their Pink Floyd and Syd Barrett archives. For whatever reason, this project died an early death and was replaced by the November 1974 Syd Barrett repackaged double album. The stereo tape continued to circulate among EMI employees until eventually a copy was leaked to a collector. By the mid-80s this collector made some, but not all, of the material available to fans. I think that they may have held on to the three Floyd songs (Vegetable Man, Scream Thy Last Scream and Untitled (67)) and possibly the vocal take of Swan Lee/Silas Lang as well.

 

Keep in mind that Peter Jenner admitted in the pages of Nicholas Shaffners book A Saucerful of Secrets to letting his copies of Scream and Vegetable (presumably the more common mono versions in circulation since at least the mid-70s) get out. The stereo versions of those songs (and remember that the 74 mixdown was to stereo) only recently surfaced on the Flaming And Screaming LP, suggesting that there are at least two different master sources for them. Also, since only one take of Silas Lang was listed on the 74 tape, Im assuming that it was the vocal take, a track that wouldnt see the light of day again until Opel appeared in 1988.

 

Also by the late-80s (at least by 1987) a copy of Malcolm Jones hastily assembled tape found its way out to fans. Many of these unmixed versions still circulate, mislabeled as outtakes. Jones is known to have been in possession of unreleased Barrett solo tracks before 1987 (including Rhamadan and Lanky Part 2), and probably had rough dubs of much of the 1968-69 material in his collection. [NOTE: the tape Jones played Ivo Trueman in 1984 of a 1968 Pink Floyd backing track seems to have been a post-Syd recording given to him by Roy Featherstone, his boss at EMI. Even Trueman noted that No, it didnt sound at all like Syd. So this is probably not the same thing as Sunshine/Experiment.] This could also explain some of the unmixed outtakes that appeared before 87. Anyway, my point is, I doubt that Jones had any Floyd-era material to work with, and he appears to be the original source of the Sunshine instrumental. But almost more importantly, if the tape EMI played Smee and Hogg was the same as the one assembled in 1974 (and again, I think it was), Untitled (67) is different from the 1:24 Sunshine instro. When talking with Chapter 24s David Parker in 1996, he described hearing both the Sunshine /Experiment instro and the 1967 Floyd Backing track, which could only mean that they were two separate pieces.

 

Now even if Im wrong here, and the 1:24 instro is an edited or incomplete Pink Floyd backing track, it would almost certainly be Untitled (67) and not the track Sunshine logged with EMI during the Piper sessions. In fact, at least four Pink Floyd master tapes were logged with EMI simply as Untitled in 1967 (and one more was logged as No Title), and EMI claimed that the backing track they played Smee and Hogg was from Floyds first EMI session. No mention of it appears in the published paperwork for that session, which would seem to point to more material existing than ever was listed. Now if its the same thing that was mixed down to stereo in 1974, it would really have been an untitled piece from 1967. Whatever the case may be, the Sunshine logged on June 29th, 1967 definitely had a title, so why would it be listed as an untitled track if it had been worked with at a later date?

 

And lets take a second to review what we do know about the real Sunshine. Its only going to take a second, because we dont know much! It was logged with EMI on June 29th, 1967 (tape number 65094), as part of a mixdown tape (as opposed to a master tape -no master for this tape appears in the published paperwork) that contained six titles. Those titles were The Bike Song (sic.), Flaming, Matilda Mother, Wondering And Dreaming, Sunshine and Lucifer Sam. These songs were probably recorded at an earlier Abbey Road session, but mixed and logged on a later date. Wondering And Dreaming is thought to be a version or segment of Matilda Mother since its a phrase from that songs lyrics. Nothing more is known about Sunshine beyond the date and tape that it was logged on with EMI. And since no verifiable outtakes from the Piper sessions have yet surfaced, Id really doubt that weve heard any part of Sunshine.

 

What I think makes more sense is that the 1:24 Sunshine/Experiment instro is something that Syd recorded in 1968 with one or more unknown musicians. Either Malcolm Jones had a copy in his own collection or he came across it in 1987 while poking around in the Barrett tapes held at Abbey Road. It was unmixed, and most likely untitled, but he decided to add it to his quickly assembled rough tape anyway. Smee and Hogg failed to include it on Opel and the Crazy Diamond box because at 1:24 it was too short to be very interesting. They probably left the two Swan Lee/Silas Lang instros off for a similar reason; they already had the more interesting vocal take. Thats why they chose to leave Lanky (Part 2) and Rhamadan; they didnt think two long drum tracks were very interesting, even to diehard fans.

 

Of course, I could be wrong. Its happened before! But if Ive done anything, I think Ive traced the history of Swan Lee, stated my case on Sunshine, and given fans a lot to think about. I know this will generate a lot of mail, so when writing keep in mind that Im not trying to present myself as an unquestionable expert. If you disagree or have a theory that I havent covered, let me know. I love hearing from people! But please understand that Im not about to get in a pissing match with anyone out there. This is all supposed to be fun, right? Right!

 

Special thanks to Daniel van Eijmeren for his help in the editing of this article.

 

Сайт создан в системе uCoz